Hammer v. Dimaio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Hammer v. Dimaio, 29 F. App'x 738 (2d Cir. 2002)

Hammer v. Dimaio

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal be and it hereby is DISMISSED.

Thomas S. Hammer appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying his motion for default judgment on his claims alleging violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1988. An order denying default judgment is not appealable because it is neither a final order, nor an interlocutory order that we are permitted to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). We dismiss the appeal because we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order.

Reference

Full Case Name
Thomas S. HAMMER v. Frank DIMAIO, M.D., Cross-Claim-Defendant-Appellee, State of NY Grievance Comm. 10th Judicial District, Cross-Defendant, Daniel Buttafuoco & Associates, Providence Washington Insurance Company, Cross-Defendants-Appellees
Status
Published