U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2002

Cardiello v. Money Store

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided March 15, 2002

29 F. App'x 780

Counsel

Paul Grobman, New York, NY; Neal A. Deyoung on the brief, for Appellants., Martin I. Kaminsky, Pollack & Kaminsky, New York, NY; W. Hans Kobelt on the brief, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision. The 12 that cite it most often are listed here.

McCrae v. Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2024)
Singh v. U.S. Bank (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)
Rosario v. Santander Consumer USA (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
Robinson v. Guzman (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
Chance v. Selip & Stylianou, LLP (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
BURRESS v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION (District Court, D. New Jersey 2021)
Lopez v. Genesis FS Card Services, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
Evans v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2020)
Knox v. Countrywide Bank (District Court, E.D. New York 2014)
Grimes v. Fremont General Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 2011)
Midouin v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n (District Court, E.D. New York 2011)
Cardiello Et Ux. v. The Money Store, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Bu*781chwald’s Memorandum and Order dated May 31, 2001. Appellants’ Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) claim is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. See 15 U.S.C. 1640(e). Moreover, Appellants’ claim fails on the merits; they have not demonstrated that Appellees violated TILA.

We affirm the District Court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs Appellants’ claim under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and their claim to enforce the Federal Trade Commission agreement for the reasons stated in Judge Buchwald’s Memorandum and Order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.