U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2002

Ortiz v. Henriquez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided August 13, 2002

41 F. App'x 516

Counsel

Fred R. Profeta, Jr., Profeta & Eisenstein, New York, NY, for appellant., Helen P. Brown, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York, NY; Michael A. Cardozo, Kristin M. Helmers, Jennifer Rossan, on the brief, for appellees.

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Milagros Ortiz, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Duffy, J.) granting summary judgment for the defendants. Ortiz only preserves her claim against the arresting officer. The district court ruled that the arresting officer was entitled to qualified immunity because his conduct was “objectively reasonable.” We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortiz v. Henriquez, et al., 99 Civ. 3268 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2001).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.