Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Wayne Seminoff Co. v. Mecham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Wayne Seminoff Co. v. Mecham, 82 F. App'x 740 (2d Cir. 2003)

Wayne Seminoff Co. v. Mecham

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Because there is no indication that the Courts Registry Investment System Liquidity Pool reports sought by plaintiff were relied upon by a court in determining the substantial rights of parties, those reports are not judicial records subject to a common law right of public access. See United States v. Graham, 257 F.3d 143, 152-53 (2d Cir. 2001). Accordingly, for this and the other reasons stated by the district court in its thorough memorandum order, Wayne Seminoff Co. v. Mecham, No. 02 CV 2445(NGG) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2003), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
WAYNE SEMINOFF CO. v. Leonidas Ralph MECHAM, as Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, and Robert C. Heinemann, as Chief Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Status
Published
↑