Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 88 F. App'x 454 (2d Cir. 2004)
Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Finding no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s denial of appellants’ Rule 60(b) motion, we affirm the order of the District Court, for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Johnson in his Memorandum and Order, see Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2003 WL 21143086 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.3, 2003). We also reject the request, made in appellants’ October 22, 2003 brief on this appeal, that this Court recall the mandate that was issued on July 31, 2001, dismissing the prior appeal.
The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Richard S. TROWBRIDGE, Dr., Lucille Donadio, Richard Coriasco, Betty Jo Merritt, Dr., Patricia Brophy, Alex Zemcov, Dr., and Michael Zembrower, Dr., individually and on behalf of all other Persons similarly situated v. INSTITUTE FOR BASIC RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OF THE OFFICE OF MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, New York State Department of Civil Service, Henryk M. Wisniewski, Dr., Melvin Hicks, Peter Vietze, Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, Michael Fenko, Thomas Maul, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Jean S. Miller, and George C. Sinnott
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published