U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2004

Spychalsky v. Sullivan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided May 25, 2004 · Lay, Straub, Winter

96 F. App'x 790

Counsel

Daniel Spychalsky, Carle Place, NY, for Appellant, pro se., Jill L. Rosenberg, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (Lisa Swanson, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Darren Petro v. Palmer College of Chiropractic (Iowa 2020)
Walker v. United States Secretary of the Air Force (District Court, D. New Jersey 2014)
Espinar Cruz v. Avis Car Rental, Inc. (P.R. Cir. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*791SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel Spychalsky, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Denis R. Hurley, Judge) entered September 2, 2003, granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Spychalsky’s complaint. We assume familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues that have been raised for appellate review and affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court in its August 29, 2003 Memorandum and Order. See Spychalsky v. Sullivan, No. 2:01cv0958, 2003 WL 22071602 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2003).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.