Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance, 112 F. App'x 123 (2d Cir. 2004)

Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

We have considered all of appellant’s arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its careful and thoughtful Memorandum and Order, entered January 27, 2004, Graham Arch. Prods. Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 303 F.Supp.2d 274 (E.D.N.Y. 2004), we find each to be without merit

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
GRAHAM ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, Riverview Architectural Products, Inc., Gary A. Fleming, Hope Fleming, Adam J. Waite, Nancy L. Waite, David A. Walter, Jane C. Walter, Keith A. Walter and Shelley L. Walter, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees
Status
Published