Amaker v. Kelly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Amaker v. Kelly, 115 F. App'x 104 (2d Cir. 2004)

Amaker v. Kelly

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Anthony D. Amaker, pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Scullin, C.J.) denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anthony D. AMAKER v. T. KELLY, Sgt., J. Landry, Lt., P.T. Justine O. Mayo, C.O., Thomas G. Eagan, D.A. Senkowski, M. Allard, Roy Girdich, G.S. Goord, Commissioner, J. Wood, I. Ellen, Dr., J. Mitchell, H. Worley, L. Wright, Dr., S. Nye, C.O., M. McKinnon, C.O., R. Rivers, L. Coryer, Sgt., A. Pavone, Sgt., L. Cayea, Sgt., D. Armitage, Lt., J. Carey, Capt., P.W. Annetts, R. Rivera, C.O., E. Aiken, S. Gideon, C.O., R. Lincoln, C.O., D. Linsley, C.O., Gordon, C.O., J. Reyell, C.O., D. Champagne, C.O., J. Kelsh, W. Carter, Sgt., F. Bushey, Phillip, Cho, Drom, Cho, Anthony J. Annucci, D. Leclair, T.L. Ricks, A. Boucaud, H. Perry, Sgt., B. Baniler, Sgt., R. Lamora, Sgt., E.W. Liberty, Sgt., G. Ronsom, Lt., R. Maynard, C. Daggett, D. Selsky, K.M. Lapp, R. Sears, C.O., J. Babbie, C.O., Champagne, Sgt., K. Lee, Dr., R. Vaughan, C.O., M. Nisoff
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published