D.F. v. Board of Education

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
D.F. v. Board of Education, 180 F. App'x 232 (2d Cir. 2006)

D.F. v. Board of Education

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff “D.F.,” through his father Andrew Finkle, appeals from a September 30, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all of his claims against all defendants on the basis of the District Court’s September 12, 2005 Memorandum and Order, 386 F.Supp.2d 119 (E.D.N.Y. 2005).

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

Substantially for the reasons stated in the thoughtful and comprehensive opinion of the District Court, we conclude that judgment for the defendants was appropriate for all claims.

We have carefully considered all of D.F.’s arguments and find them without merit. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
D.F., by his Parent and Natural Guardian, Andrew Finkle v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SYOSSET CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT James Kassebaum, both individually and in his capacity as principal of the Harry B. Thompson Middle School and Carole G. Hankin, both individually and in her capacity as superintendent of the Syosset Central School District
Cited By
13 cases
Status
Published