Thyroff v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Thyroff v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Opinion

05-4005 Thyroff v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________________________

August Term, 2005

(Argued: April 11, 2006 Decided: June 15, 2007)

Docket No. 05-4005-cv _______________________________

LOUIS E. THYROFF,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE LIFE INS., NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONWIDE VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE AND COLONIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN,

Defendants-Appellees. _______________________________

Before: WINTER, CALABRESI, POOLER, Circuit Judges. _______________________________

Plaintiff-appellant Louis E. Thyroff appeals from a district court’s dismissal of his

conversion claim and the court’s grant of summary judgment on his breach of contract claim.

Following response by the New York Court of Appeals on the certified question of whether a

claim of conversion is cognizable for electronic data, we vacate the district court’s dismissal of

Thyroff’s conversion claim and remand for further proceedings.

1 ______________________________

WILLIAM P. TEDARDS, JR., Washington, D.C. (Leo G. Finucane, Finucane & Hartzell, LLP, Pittsford, NY, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

BEN M. KROWICKI, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Hartford, CT, for Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant Louis E. Thyroff appeals an adverse decision by the United States

District Court for the Western District of New York (Telesca, J.) dismissing his claims for

conversion and breach of contract. We assume familiarity with the underlying facts and

procedural history, which are provided at Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.,

460 F.3d 400

(2d Cir. 2006), certified question answered by Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.,

8 N.Y.3d 283

(N.Y. 2007). In our prior opinion in this case, we affirmed the district court’s

grant of summary judgment dismissing Thyroff’s breach of contract claim, and certified the

following question to the New York Court of Appeals: “Is a claim for the conversion of

electronic data cognizable under New York law?” Thyroff,

460 F.3d at 408

. On March 22,

2007, the New York Court of Appeals answered the certified question in the affirmative. See

Thyroff,

8 N.Y.3d at 293

. As we explained in our prior decision, “if a conversion claim may

extend to electronic data, Thyroff has stated a claim sufficient to survive Nationwide’s motion to

dismiss for both his personal and business data.” Thyroff,

460 F.3d at 405

. Accordingly, based

on the response from the New York Court of Appeals that electronic data may be the subject of a

conversion claim under New York law, we vacate the district court’s dismissal of Thyroff’s

conversion claim and remand for further proceedings.

2

Reference

Status
Published