U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2009

United States v. Ferraris

United States v. Ferraris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided May 6, 2009 · Hon, Leval, Newman, Wesley
324 F. App'x 114

United States v. Ferraris

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Mark Ferraris challenges as unreasonable his sentence, which includes imprisonment for 36 months. He pled guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. The District Court granted a downward departure from the Guidelines range of 87 to 109 months.

The claim that the sentence is unreasonable is entirely without merit. Also without merit is the claim that the sentencing judge failed to give adequate consideration to the relevant sentencing factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Verkhoglyad, 516 F.3d 122, 127, 129 (2d Cir. 2008).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.