New York Credit & Financial Management Group v. Parson Center Pharmacy, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rigueiro v. The Republic of Argentina (District Court, S.D. New York 2020)
- Colella v. The Republic of Argentina (District Court, S.D. New York 2020)
- Forgione v. The Republic of Argentina (District Court, S.D. New York 2020)
- Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v. Best Brands Consumer Products, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2020)
- Plastech Holding Corp. v. WM GreenTech Automotive Corp. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2017)
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. Clarke (District Court, E.D. New York 2025)
- King Quality Construction Inc. v. King Siding & Gutters Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)
- Chen v. Thai Greenleaf Restaurant Corp (District Court, E.D. New York 2023)
- Brandon v. Schroyer (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)
- Brandon v. Schroyer (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)
- Ji v. New Aily Foot Relax Station Inc (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
- (HC)Bowen v. Garland (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- De Jesus v. Gregorys Coffee Management, LLC (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- International Technologies Marketing, Inc. v. Cognyte Technologies Israel Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- Diarra v. New York City (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- Network Data Rooms, LLC v. Saulrealism LLC (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- Brock v. Logsdon (District Court, W.D. New York 2022)
- Kang v. Perri (District Court, E.D. New York 2021)
- Garcia v. Griffin (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Sanders v. Sanders (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Saravia v. Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2020)
- Sunday's Child, LLC v. Irongate AZREP BW LLC (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 2018)
- Almeciga v. Center for Investigative Reporting, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2016)
- Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Azrack, Mag. J.), which imposed sanctions against Robert Drucker and RxUSA, jointly and severally, in the amount of $100,000. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
Sanctions for fraud are warranted if it is “established by clear and convincing evidence that [Defendant] has ‘sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate’ the action.” Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer, 221 F.Supp.2d 425, 439 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)), aff'd 81 Fed.Appx. 396, 398 (2d Cir. 2003). Falsifying evidence is sanctionable conduct. Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys. Inc., 794 F.2d 763, 768 (2d Cir. 1986). Submitting falsified evidence is also properly sanction-able. See Scholastic Inc., 221 F.Supp.2d at 440-441, aff'd 81 Fed.Appx. at 398.
The record in this case supports the district court’s findings of fact that Appellant Drucker falsified and falsely authenticated falsified evidence and that Appellants relied upon and submitted the falsified evidence in connection with a motion for summary judgment. Appellant’s actions constitute sanctionable conduct, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing sanctions in this case.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.