Appellant Spies petitions for a rehearing of our decision in United States v. Nadirashvili, 655 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2011). In that decision, we, inter alia, vacated appellant Solomonyan’s sentence because the district court used the incorrect standard — preponderance of the evidence — in applying two offense level enhancements under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for the involvement of: (i) 200 or more firearms, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(l)(E); and (ii) a destructive device, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(3)(A).

Spies argues that his sentence should also be vacated because the district court used the preponderance of the evidence standard in applying the same offense enhancements in the calculation of his guidelines sentence. We agree. We also, sua sponte, take note that the same incorrect standard was used in applying the destructive device enhancement as to appellant Kharabadze. While neither appellant argued this point in their respective briefs, 1 and Kharabadze has not filed a motion for rehearing, we believe that it is in the inter *1159 est of justice to vacate both of their sentences.

We therefore grant the petition for rehearing, vacate the sentences of Spies and Kharabadze, and remand to the district court for resentencing consistent with our prior opinion.