Jones-Reid v. Astrue
Cases that cite this one
29 later published cases cite this decision. The 21 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Long v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2020)
- Phenes v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. New York 2023)
- Intravia v. Berryhill (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2019)
- Holl v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2024)
- Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. New York 2024)
- Gibbons v. Commissioner of Social Security (2d Cir. 2023)
- Civitello v. Kijakazi (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2023)
- Darcy v. Saul (District Court, E.D. New York 2023)
- Henderson v. Kijakazi (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)
- Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)
- Adam v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2022)
- Gibbons v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. New York 2022)
- Brown v. Saul (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2022)
- Price v. Saul (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2021)
- Fritz v. Saul (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2021)
- McClanahan v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2021)
- Holl v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, N.D. New York 2021)
- Pickett v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, D. Vermont 2021)
- Lumpkin v. Commissioner of Social Security (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2020)
- Masoud v. Berryhill (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2020)
- Wascholl v. Saul (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Sandra Jones-Reid appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, J.) affirming the denial of her application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
After reviewing the record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the vocational analysis and the conclusion that Jones-Reid is able to perform light work, see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1567(b) and 416.967(b), with the restrictions imposed. See Burgess v. Astrue, 537 F.3d 117, 128 (2d Cir. 2008). Additionally, we find no merit to Jones-Reid’s claims that the ALJ improperly weighed the relevant medical opinions or made erroneous credibility determinations.
We have considered all of Jones-Reid’s arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.