Gortat v. Capala Brothers, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Gonzalez v. Wicked Taco LLC (District Court, E.D. New York 2025)
- Peralto v. Aviles-Ramos (District Court, S.D. New York 2025)
- Wilk v. Quality Installation of NY, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)
- Martinez v. JLM Decorating, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2024)
- Carabajo v. APCO Insulation Co., Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2023)
- Blanco v. United States (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
- Estate of Charles T. Close v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Corporation (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
- Headly v. Liberty Homecare Options, LLC (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2022)
- Nordwald v. Brightlink Communications, LLC (District Court, D. Kansas 2022)
- Abbananto v. County of Nassau (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- Valdez v. Michpat & Fam, LLC (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- Li v. Fleet New York Metropolitan Regional Center LLC (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- In re: AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- Rubio v. BSDB Management Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- In re Allergan PLC Securities Litigation (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Coeur, Inc. v. Wygal (District Court, W.D. New York 2021)
- Home Point Financial Corporation v. Bliss Home Funding Corp. (District Court, E.D. New York 2020)
- Alexander v. Azar (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2019)
- Leary v. Al-Mubaraki (District Court, S.D. New York 2019)
- Lee v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2019)
- In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig. (District Court, S.D. Illinois 2018)
- Sanchez v. New York Kimchi Catering, Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Following six years of litigation over unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and New York law, Appellees prevailed following a two-week jury trial on each of their claims, as well as counterclaims asserted against them. Appellants Capala Brothers, Inc., Pawel Capala, and Robert Capala now appeal a host of orders and decisions issued before, during, and after trial, as well as the judgment entered by *79 the District Court. For substantially the same reasons as the District Court below, we affirm the District Court’s orders and judgment on appeal. Appellant Felipe Or-ner also appeals an order of the district court imposing sanctions upon him. Again, for substantially the same reasons as the District Court below, we affirm the District Court’s order as to Orner. We have considered all of Appellants’ remaining arguments—including their challenge to the district court’s impartiality—and have found them to be waived or without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court and the order as to Orner are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.