Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Trustmark Insurance
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Pendergast v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2024)
- Gerald Metals, LLC v. Davidson (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2021)
- General Re Life Corp. v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Arrowood Indemnity Co., as successor to Fire and Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut, appeals an order denying its motion for judgment and contempt against Trustmark Insurance Co. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history (as implausible as that history may be), and the issues on appeal.
We review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. See, e.g., Zeiler v. Deitsch, 500 F.3d 157, 164 (2d Cir. 2007); Huber v. Marine Midland Bank, 51 F.3d 5, 10 (2d Cir. 1995). Upon such review, we conclude that Arrowood’s motion was appropriately denied, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned March 29, 2013 Memorandum of Decision. See Arrowood Indem. Co. v. Trustmark Ins. Co., 938 F.Supp.2d 267 (D.Conn. 2013).
We have considered all of Arrowood’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. The order of the district court is hereby affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.