SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Timothy Sizer (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for social security benefits. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal.

Appellant principally challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination that Appellant was capable of performing sedentary work, as defined in 20 C.F.R. § 416.967(a), with additional, enumerated limitations. 1 This determination was based on the medical opinion evidence, the objective medical evidence, and Appellant’s testimony at the ALJ hearing. The ALJ properly accorded “little weight” to the non-specialist medical opinion of Appellant’s treating physician because it was inconsistent with “other substantial evidence in the case record” and, therefore, undeserving of “controlling weight.” See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.927(c)(2); Halloran v. Barnhart, 362 F.3d 28, 32 (2d Cir. 2004) (per curiam). The Commissioner’s decision applied the appropriate legal standards and is supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record.

We have considered all of Appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.