SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Financial Federal Credit Inc. (“FFCI”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, /.), granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Ramar Crane Services, LLC, Ramar Steel Sales, Inc., and Ramar Steel Erectors, Inc. (collectively, “Ra-mar”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing all evidence in the manner most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Janes v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 774 F.3d 1052, 1054 (2d Cir. 2014).

1. The Liebherr crane: as the district court concluded, Ramar qualifies as a buyer in the ordinary course under section 1-201(9) of the New York Uniform Commercial Code. 1 Ramar purchased the Lie- *40 bherr crane, in cash, from a used crane dealer. The conditional “buy back” option (which was never exercised) and the contemplated “trade-in” of another crane (which never happened) are not enough to take this transaction out of the “ordinary course of business” under New York U.C.C. § 1-201(9). The district court correctly concluded that Ramar purchased the Liebherr crane free of any security interest from FFCI. See N.Y. U.C.C. § 9-320(a).

2. The Tadano crane: we agree with the district court that FFCI never obtained a perfected security interest in the Tadano, because Ramar neither completed the sale, nor delivered the crane. See N.Y. U.C.C. §§ 2-106(1), 2-401.

For the foregoing reasons, and finding no merit in FFCI’s other arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.