15-2605-cv Anderson v. Eastern CT Health Network, et al.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 29th day of August, two thousand sixteen.

PRESENT: JOHN M. WALKER, JR., JOSÉ A. CABRANES, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges.

HARRY T. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 15-2605-cv

v.

EASTERN CT HEALTH NETWORK, INC., AKA ECHN, INC., AND EASTERN CONNECTICUT MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOUNDATION, INC., FKA ECHN HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: MARY ALICE MOORE LEONHARDT (Daniel J. Csuka, on the brief), Rome McGuigan, P.C., Hartford, CT.

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: BEVERLY W. GAROFALO (Collin O’Connor Udell, on the brief), Jackson Lewis P.C., Hartford, CT.

1 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Robert N. Chatigny, Judge).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Harry T. Anderson appeals from a judgment entered on July 20, 2015 resulting from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Eastern CT Health Network, Inc. and Eastern Connecticut Medical Professionals Foundation, Inc. on July 16, 2015. We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Anderson on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the July 20, 2015 judgment of the District Court for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court in its Ruling and Order filed July 16, 2015.

FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

2