U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1894

Maitland v. Gibson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided October 22, 1894 · Acheson, Butler, Wales

63 F. 840; 11 C.C.A. 446; 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444

Counsel

Bichard ZEST. Dyer, for appellant., Hector T. Fenton, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Pelzer v. Dale Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York 1900)
Maitland v. Graham (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois 1899)
Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. Pelzer (3d Cir. 1898)
Pelzer v. Geise (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania 1898)
Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York 1896)
Lowell v. Triplett (4th Cir. 1935)
Paul Boynton Co. v. Morris Chute Co. (3d Cir. 1898)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

After a thorough examination of this record, we fail to discover any ground for disturbing the decree dismissing the bill of complaint. We all concur in the conclusions of the circuit court, and in the reasons therefor expressed in its opinion. That opinion is so full and satisfactory that any further discussion of the case is needless. We therefore adopt the opinion of the court below as our own, and upon it we affirm the decree. Decree affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.