U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1905

Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided February 3, 1905 · Bradford, Dadlas, Dallas, Gray

134 F. 1021; 68 C.C.A. 249; 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296

Counsel

Samuel Dickson, for plaintiff in error., G. W. Pepper, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

American Central Ins. Co. of St. Louis v. McHose (3d Cir. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.