U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1916

F. F. Slocomb & Co. v. A. C. Layman Mach. Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided March 9, 1916 · Buffington, McPherson, Ouriam, Woolley

230 F. 1021; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1523; 144 C.C.A. 286

Counsel

E. H. Fairbanks, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. William S. Jackson and Howson & Howson, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. Mfg. Co. (District Court, E.D. New York 1934)
Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1926)
Greenawalt v. American Smelting & Refining Co. (District Court, D. Montana 1925)
Pacific States Electric Co. v. Wright (9th Cir. 1922)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

In this patent case we have had the benefit of an able and illuminating opinion by the judge below, which is reported in 227 Fed. 94. The case was thoroughly argued in this court, and has since had our careful examination and consideration. We find no error in the decree below, and it will be affirmed. An opinion by us would simply be an effort to restate in different language what has already been so well said by Judge Bradford. We avoid needless duplication by adopting his opinion as expressive of our views.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.