Miller v. State
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Miller v. State, 96 So. 718 (3d Cir. 1923)
19 Ala. App. 229; 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
Sameord
Miller v. State
Opinion of the Court
The indictment in both counts follows the statute, and is sufficient.
We have several times held that the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305) does not supersede the state laws prohibiting the manufacture of whisky. Mary Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 170, 93 South. 293.
The exceptions reserved to the introduction of evidence are without merit.
, We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. .
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Miller v. State.
- Status
- 1919
- Syllabus
- Jr.