U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1924

Wood v. Brighton Mills

Wood v. Brighton Mills
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided February 13, 1924
297 F. 594; 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2863

Counsel

Robert B. Honeyman, of New York City, for appellant., Herbert j. Ryall, of New York City, for appellee Brighton Mills., Robert T. Swaine, of New York City, for appellee Jenckes Spinning Co., Scott Scammell, of New York City, for creditors’ committee.

Wood v. Brighton Mills

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After reading the records in these cases and carefully considering the questions discussed in the accompanying briefs, we find ourselves everywhere in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of the learned trial judge. Important as are the questions raised and large as are the sums at stake, a recital of the extended correspondence between the parties on which the cases mainly turn” and a discussion of the questions of law growing out of it would, we think, involve merely a repetition of the reasoning of the learned trial judge, and ¡would add nothing to the decisions. We shall therefore affirm the judgments on his opinions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.