U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1926

McDowell v. Heiner

McDowell v. Heiner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided December 7, 1926 · Buffington, Woolley, Dayis
15 F.2d 1015; 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 6451; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3104; 6 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 6451 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William G. Heiner, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant., Charles T. Hendler, of Washington, D. C., John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and A. W. Gregg and Chester A. Gwinn, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee., Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Palls, Tex., amicus curiae.

McDowell v. Heiner

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the court below, reported at 9 F.(2d) 120, is so full and satisfactory that a further one by this court cannot perforce be but an attempt to restate what that court satisfactorily said. We therefore restrict ourselves to adopting its opinion and affirming its decree, dismissing plaintiff’s biR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.