U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1929

May v. Heiner

May v. Heiner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided January 9, 1929
32 F.2d 1017; 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8771; 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963; 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 8771 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Sachs & Caplan and Charles H. Sachs, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants., John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Wm. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., and John A. McCann, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (C. M. Charest and Ottamar Hamele, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

May v. Heiner

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.