U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1931

George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co.

George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided September 9, 1931 · Buffington, Woolley, and Davis, Circuit Judges
52 F.2d 714; 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)
George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

52 F.2d 714 (1931)

GEORGE K. HALE MFG. CO.
v.
HAFLEIGH & CO. et al.

No. 4487.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

September 9, 1931.

*715 *716 *717 *718 *719 J. Preston Swecker and Vernon E. Hodges, both of Washington, D. C., and Albert W. Sanson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Chas. H. Howson and Dexter N. Shaw, both of Philadelphia, Pa. (Bryan A. Hermes, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the trial judge so fully and satisfactorily discusses and properly disposes of every question involved in this case that a further opinion by this court would be but an effort to clothe in different language what has been already said. After careful individual study and joint conference by the members of this court, they all agree in affirming the decree below on that court's opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.