U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1936

Hernig v. Bell

Hernig v. Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 25, 1936
84 F.2d 1003; 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4744 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Hernig v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The case depends on its own unusual facts which, by reference to the opinion of the court below, (Bender Body Co. v. Quaker City Motor Truck Lines, Inc., 15 F.Supp. 401), can be seen and need not be here repeated.

The basic question is whether the court erred in holding that $1,200 in the hands of the receivers-appelj'ees was not impressed with a trust in appellant’s favor.

After argument and consideration had, we are satisfied the trial court committed no error. Any rights the appellant had in *1004such policy were not affected by the settlement made by the receivers. So holding, its decree is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.