In Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia v. Ocean City, N. J., 91 F.2d 635, our opinion concluded with the sentence: “The judgment of the court below is reversed.”

As was stated by this court in Kosak v. United States, 54 F.2d 72, a mandate which orders judgment reversed may imply a direction for a new trial. In the instant case we intended that the cause be resubmitted to a jury and therefore direct that our opinion and mandate be so construed.