U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1941

Vennell v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided October 13, 1941

122 F.2d 936; 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 950; 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3122 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Lewis H. VanDusen, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (Drinker, Biddle & Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Carl J. Marold, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Frederic G. Rita, Sp. 'Assts. to Atty; Gen., and Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty,, and Thomas J. Curtin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United States (Court of Claims 1954)
Interwoven Stocking Co. v. United States (3d Cir. 1944)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Bard, 36 F.Supp. 646 and 38 F.Supp. 381.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.