National Hairdressers'& Cosmetologists'association v. Philad Company
National Hairdressers'& Cosmetologists'association v. Philad Company
129 F.2d 1020; 54 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 512; 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3492
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
National Hairdressers'& Cosmetologists'association v. Philad Company
Opinion
NATIONAL HAIRDRESSERS' & COSMETOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION, Inc., et al.
v.
The PHILAD COMPANY, Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio (Herbert L. Cohen, of Wilmington, Del., and J. T. Hoffmann, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
*1021 George B. Finnegan, Jr., of New York City (E. Ennalls Berl, of Wilmington, Del., and Hobart N. Durham, of New York City, on the brief), for appellees.
Before MARIS and JONES, Circuit Judges and SMITH, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decree of the district court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Biggs, 41 F.Supp. 701.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.