Shotkin v. Gleeson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Shotkin v. Gleeson, 125 F.2d 708 (3d Cir. 1942)
1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4461

Shotkin v. Gleeson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

At the request of the plaintiff and with the consent of the defendants this case was submitted to the court without oral argument on either side. After consideration of the record and of the plaintiff’s brief we are satisfied that the plaintiff’s contentions are without merit and that the district court committed no error in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly the decree of the ■ district court is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bernard M. SHOTKIN v. Gerald A. GLEESON, U. S. Attorney
Status
Published