U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1944

Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided December 1, 1944 · Biggs, Jones, Laughlin

145 F.2d 471; 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leslie B. Young, of New York City (Joseph G. Young, of Newark, N. J., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant., William S. Pritchard, of New York City (John W. Steward, of Paterson, N. J., Harry H. Levin, of New York City, and John W. Steward, of Paterson, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Uncas Manufacturing Co. v. McGrath-Hamin, Inc. (District Court, D. Rhode Island 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After study of the briefs and the record in this case we see no occasion for further discussion of the valid reasons cogently and clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Smith, 50 F.Supp. 395, for declaring the claims of the patent sub judice to be invalid. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.