U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1947

Walshaw v. Irwin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 5, 1947 · No. 9205

161 F.2d 184; 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2749 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Harry R. Axelroth, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Daniel J. McCauley, Jr., and Axelroth and Porteous, both of Philadelphia, Pa., and Lowry N. Coe, of Washington, D. G, on the brief), for Irwin., James J. Leyden, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Schnader, Ken worth ey, Segal & Lewis of Philadelphia, Pa., and Thomas D. Caldwell and Caldwell, Fox & Stoner, all of Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for Wai-shaw.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Consideration of the briefs, the oral argument of the parties and the appendix convinces us that the court below did not commit any substantial error in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant and in refusing to grant a new trial to the plaintiff.

The judgment of the District Court, is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.