Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
197 F.2d 525; 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2651
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Opinion
An examination of the record discloses substantial evidence of negligence to sustain the jury’s verdict against the defendant. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 323 U.S. 600, 604, 65 S.Ct. 545, 89 L.Ed. 490. Cf. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 328. The evidence also shows that the plaintiff’s act was not the sole efficient cause of the injury. A careful examination of the record and review of the briefs and oral argument convince us that the court below committed no prejudicial error. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.