Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission
Opinion
A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court below committed np 'error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the opinion of Judge Kalodner. See 100 F.Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Arthur W. GIBSON v. UNITED STATES of America, United States Maritime Commission, Appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published