Ackerman v. Hook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit February 6, 1953

Ackerman v. Hook, 201 F.2d 890 (3d Cir. 1953)

Opinion

Harold S. ACKERMAN
v.
C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance, R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellants.

No. 10860.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 22, 1953.

Decided February 6, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

Harry Price, New York City (Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman.

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller, and for R. O. Graffius.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case will be affirmed for the reasons set out by Judge Kirkpatrick in his opinion in that court, 109 F.Supp. 933.

Reference

Full Case Name: Harold S. Ackerman v. C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc. Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
Status: Published