Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1953

Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided February 6, 1953 · Goodrich, Hastie, Staley
201 F.2d 512 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Harry Price, New York City (Stoneciptier & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Birón, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.

Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opihion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F.Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.