U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1954

United States v. Segelman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided April 8, 1954 · Biggs, Ka-Lodner, Per Curiam, Staley

212 F.2d 88; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Irving Segelman, pro se., for appellant., John W. McIlvaine, U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., Dail E. Sloan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brownsville, Pa., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Gold (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1979)
United States v. Robinson (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 1972)
Lyman Moody Bennett v. United States (5th Cir. 1961)
United States v. Clayton (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1961)
State v. Jarrett (Mo. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The provisions of Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, may not be employed as the appellant, Segelman, seeks to make use of them, in order to correct alleged errors committed by the court below during Segelman’s trial. The sentences imposed upon Segelman were not imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and the court had jurisdiction to impose the sentences. Segelman appealed from the judgments against him, D.C., 86 F.Supp. 114, but his appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. No question cognizable under Section 2255 was before the court below. 117 F.Supp. 507. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.