U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1957

Samuel A. Newman and Helen B. Newman, His Wife v. Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided January 7, 1957 · Biggs, Maris, Kraft

239 F.2d 384; 51 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 381; 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5255 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leonard Shapiro, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants., Charles B. E. Freeman, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., D. Malcolm Anderson, Jr., U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern Utilities (United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia 1983)
Arthur Company v. Chicago Paints, Inc. (D. Minn. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The interesting issue presented by this appeal is covered fully and correctly by the findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion of the court below, 141 F. Supp. 37. No useful purpose would be served by repeating here what was said by the trial court.

The judgment of the court below therefore will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Marsh.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.