U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1958

United States v. Emanuel Riggi

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 27, 1958 · Kalodner, Staley, Hastie

256 F.2d 57; 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4293 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N. J. (Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellant., Frederic C. Ritger, Jr., Asst. U. S Atty., Newark, N. J. (Chester A, Weidenburner, U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Campbell (District Court, D. South Carolina 1967)
Garvin v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1962)
Bruce Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1962)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We find no error in the trial court’s charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.