Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States
Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States
276 F.2d 927; 5 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1175; 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States
Opinion
Judge Madden in the District Court held that the transfer of properties and lease back arrangement, here involved, between the taxpayer and the insurance company, was in substance a mortgage, not a sale and therefore taxpayer was not entitled to receive credit for a capital loss.
Under the particular facts and the law of the case (see Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co., 1939, 308 U.S. 252, 60 S.Ct. 209, 84 L.Ed. 226) we must agree.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.