U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1962

Phoenix Insurance Company-Respondent v. Guy B. Iacona, Etc., and Ralph Grasso

Phoenix Insurance Company-Respondent v. Guy B. Iacona, Etc., and Ralph Grasso
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided January 24, 1962 · Hastie, Kalodner, McLAUGHLIN, Per Curiam
298 F.2d 638 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John J. Corcoran, Jr., Jersey City, N. J. (Ralph Grasso, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for defendant-appellant., Myron Engelman, New York City (Engelman & Hart, New York City, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Respondent, Henry H. Abrams, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-respondent.

Phoenix Insurance Company-Respondent v. Guy B. Iacona, Etc., and Ralph Grasso

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive question on this appeal is whether the district judge abused his discretion in refusing to charge appellee with interest on the amount due on its payment bond from the date of filing suit until the cash was paid into court. Despite the impressive argument on behalf of appellant, under the facts we must conclude that the district judge acted within his discretion in deciding as he did.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.