National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company, 313 F.2d 633 (3d Cir. 1963)
52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528
National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company
Opinion
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board’s Order is valid and proper.
For the reasons stated the Board’s petition for enforcement will be granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. Samuel CHERICO, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent
- Status
- Published