U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1963

National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company

National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided February 27, 1963 · Kalodner, Staley, Smith
313 F.2d 633; 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board’s Order is valid and proper.

For the reasons stated the Board’s petition for enforcement will be granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.