U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1963

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 65, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided June 4, 1963 · Biggs, Ganey, Hastie, Per Curiam

318 F.2d 419; 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430; 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5096 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Warren M. Davison, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Atty., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for petitioner., Robert D. Corbin, Newark, N. J. (Joseph P. Dunn, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

Lummus Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (D.C. Cir. 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record demonstrates that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence viewing the record as a whole and that its conclusions of law are correct. Moreover we do not regard the case as moot and the fact that there has been compliance with the Board’s order does not militate against the injunction sought by it. Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & etc. Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 715, 71 S.Ct. 966, 95 L.Ed. 1309 (1951); Lakeland Bus Lines Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, 278 F.2d 888, 891-892 (3 Cir. 1960).

A decree may be submitted to enforce the Board’s order in full.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.