U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1963

United States v. An Article of Device Consisting of 24 Devices

United States v. An Article of Device Consisting of 24 Devices
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided June 18, 1963 · Hastie, Kalodner, Smith
319 F.2d 531 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Milton A. Bass, New York City (Bass & Friend, New York City, on the brief), for appellant., Duane L. Nelson, Criminal Division, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Jerome D. Schwitzer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

United States v. An Article of Device Consisting of 24 Devices

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dated June 4, 1962 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Wortendyke in his opinion reported at 202 F.Supp. 147 (D.N.J. 1962).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.