U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1964

Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided April 22, 1964 · Kalodner, Staley, Hastie

330 F.2d 613; 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5607 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Paul Ginsburg, pro se, appellant., I. Martin Wekselman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Robert M. Brown, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Juan Emaldio v. Pocahontas Steamship Company (4th Cir. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court below found that the appellant’s “Motion to Strike Judgment and Quash Execution Thereon” presented no new matter and “was merely a rehash and a resubmission of contentions incorporated previously in various motions”. The court then concluded “that what is now being done is purely a matter of delay” and denied the motion. This appeal followed.

Our independent examination of the long series of post judgment motions filed by the appellant in this case convinces us that the district court’s characterization and disposition of this motion were proper.

The district court’s order will be affirmed. The appellees’ costs and an attorney’s fee of $500. on this appeal shall be taxed against the appellant. See Ginsburg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (C.A.3, 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987, 82 S.Ct. 603, 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.