Rath v. United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Ass'n

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Rath v. United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Ass'n, 331 F.2d 307 (3d Cir. 1964)

Rath v. United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Ass'n

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A consideration of the points raised by the defendants-appellants demonstrates that they are without merit. Contrary to the appellants’ contentions the plaintiff has stated claims upon which relief could be granted. The court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties and its judgment in favor of the plaintiff was well founded in fact and in law. Careful scrutiny of the procedure leading up to the trial and an examination of the proceedings at trial demonstrate neither unfairness nor prejudice to the appellants. Consequently, the judgment will be affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arlene R. RATH, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Frederick Rath, III v. UNITED NEW JERSEY SANDY HOOK PILOT'S ASSOCIATION Arlene R. RATH, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Frederick Rath, III v. UNITED NEW JERSEY SANDY HOOK PILOT'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Association and United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Benevolent Association
Status
Published