Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, 340 F.2d 709 (3d Cir. 1965)
1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6719
Biggs, Kalodner, Per Curiam, Smith

Harold F. Cochran v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is sufficient evidence in the case at bar to justify the conclusion that the negligence of the defendant played a part in causing the plaintiff’s injury. The defendant-appellant argues in this court for the first time that a new trial should be granted because the verdict was against the weight of the medical evidence. Since this issue was not raised in the court below, we shall not consider it here. United States v. Ivy Hall Apartments, Inc., 310 F.2d 5, 10 (3 Cir. 1962). The judgment will be affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harold F. COCHRAN v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
Status
Published